Sunday, September 21, 2008

Latest Arrest of ISA





Latest arrest of ISA

Ever heard of what is ISA??

The Internal Security Act 1960 (ISA) (Malay: Akta Keselamatan Dalam Negeri) is a preventive detention law in force in Malaysia. The legislation was inherited by Malaysia after it gained independence from Britain in 1957. In essence, it allows for the arrest of any person without the need for trial in certain defined circumstances. Malaysia is one of the few countries in the world whose Constitution allows for preventive detention during peacetime without safeguards that elsewhere are understood to be basic requirements for protecting fundamental human rights.

Preventive detention first became a feature of the then Malaya in 1948 primarily to combat the armed insurgency of the Malayan Communist Party. The Emergency Regulations Ordinance 1948 was made, following the proclamation of an emergency, by the British High Commissioner Sir Edward Gent. It allowed the detention of persons for any period not exceeding one year. The 1948 ordinance was primarily made to counter acts of violence and, conceivably, preventive detention was meant to be temporary in application. The emergency ended in 1960 and with it ended the powers contained in the that ordinance as it was repealed. The power of preventive detention was however not relinquished and in fact became an embedded feature of Malaysian law. In 1960 itself, the government passed the Internal Security Act under Article 149 of the Malaysian Constitution. It permitted the detention, at the discretion of the Home Minister, without charge or trial of any person in respect of whom the Home Minister was satisfied that such detention was necessary to prevent him or her from acting in any manner prejudicial to national security or to the maintenance of essential services or to the economic life in Malaysia. The ISA is one of the most controversial Acts enacted under Article 149 of the Malaysian Constitution.

Detention

ISA detainees are typically held at the Kamunting Detention Center.

First 60 days

A person detained under the ISA during the first 60 days is held incommunicado, with no access to the outside world. Furthermore, lawyers and family members are not allowed access to the detainee during this initial period. If a two-year detention order is signed, the detainee is taken to the Kamunting Detention Centre to serve his or her two-year term, during which family members are allowed to visit. Otherwise, the detainee may be released.

The following list shows known current and former detainees under the Internal Security Act:

Year

Name

Detention Period

Role

Reason for Detention

1974

Anwar Ibrahim

20 months

student protester


1987

Lim Kit Siang

2 Years

DAP Secretary General

Operation Lalang

1987

Chandra Muzaffar

released either conditionally or unconditionally

ALIRAN President Chandra Muzaffar

Operation Lalang

1987

Chan Kit Chee

released either conditionally or unconditionally

MCA Vice President and Perak

Operation Lalang

1987

Karpal Singh

2 Years

DAP Deputy Chairman

Operation Lalang

1987

Halim Arshat

released either conditionally or unconditionally

PAS Youth Chief

Operation Lalang

1987

Ibrahim Ali

released either conditionally or unconditionally

UMNO MP for Pasir Mas

Operation Lalang

1987

Fahmi Ibrahim

released either conditionally or unconditionally

UMNO Youth Education

Operation Lalang

1987

Dong Jiao Zhong

released either conditionally or unconditionally

Chinese Education Associations

Operation Lalang

1987

Lim Fong Seng

released either conditionally or unconditionally

Chairman Chinese Education Associations

Operation Lalang

1987

Kua Kia Soong

released either conditionally or unconditionally

Publicity Chief of the Civil Rights Committee

Operation Lalang

1987

Irene Xavier

released either conditionally or unconditionally

WAO Member

Operation Lalang

1987

Hilmy Noor

released either conditionally or unconditionally

accused for "disrupting the Malay culture by being a Christian"

Operation Lalang

1990-1991

Abdul Rahman Ahmad


Assistant Superintendent of Police, Special Branch

arrested during Operation Talkak

1990-1991

Albinus Yudah


opposition party member, member of Kadazan Cultural Association

arrested during Operation Talkak

1990-1991

Benedict Topin


opposition party member, Executive Secretary of Kadazan Cultural Association

arrested during Operation Talkak

1990-1991

Damit Undikai


retired Special Branch police officer

arrested during Operation Talkak

1990-1991

Jeffrey Kitingan


opposition politician, director of the Institute for Development Studies

arrested during Operation Talkak

1990-1991

Maximus Ongkili


deputy chief director of the Institute for Development Studies

arrested during Operation Talkak

1990-1991

Vincent Chung


administrator, Sabah Foundation

arrested during Operation Talkak

1998

Anwar Ibrahim


Sodomy and corruption (Deputy Prime Minister)


2001

Yazid Sufaat


Jemaah Islamiyah suspected terrorist


2001

Raja Petra Kamarudin

52 days

Blogger of Malaysia Today


2007

K. Kengadhadran


Hindu Rights Action Force activist (Lawyer)

Organize Hindraf mass rally in KL November 2007


2007

M. Manoharan


Hindu Rights Action Force activist (Lawyer)

Organize Hindraf mass rally in KL November 2007


2007

P. Uthayakumar,


Hindu Rights Action Force activist (Lawyer)

Organize Hindraf mass rally in KL November 2007


2007

T. Vasantha Kumar


Hindu Rights Action Force activist (Lawyer)

Organize Hindraf mass rally in KL November 2007


2007

K. Ganabathi Rao


Hindu Rights Action Force activist (Lawyer)

Organize Hindraf mass rally in KL November 2007


2008

Raja Petra Kamarudin


Blogger of Malaysia Today

Accused of insulting islamic religion


2008

Tan Hoon Cheng

18 hours

Journalist, Sin Chew Jit Poh

Accused of writing a report (on Ahmad Ismail's Incendiary Racist Remarks) that may incite hatred among the Malay and Chinese. The Home Minister later explained she was detained as her security was threatened, which is irrelevant


2008

Teresa Kok Suh Sim

7 days

Member of Parliament, Seputeh

Accused of insulting islamic religion


Criticism

An artist's portrayal of the Internal Security Act. The law has attracted criticism when dealing with civil rights issues.

Due to the alleged draconian nature of the ISA, several human rights organisations and opposition political parties have strongly criticised the act and called for its repeal. Foreign governments, notably that of the United States, have also pressured the government to repeal the act.

Latest ISA arrest will be on Raja Petra

On Sept 6, Home Minister Syed Hamid Albar had warned the 58-year old editor of popular news portal Malaysia Today he could be charged under the ISA for comments allegedly insulting Islam and Prophet Muhammad

Several religious groups - Malaysian Islamic Development Department (Jakim), Yayasan Dakwah Islamiah Malaysia (Yadim), Federal Territory Islamic Religious Council (Maiwp) and Federal Territory Religious Department (Jawi) - had lodged police reports against him.

The groups complained his comment in an article entitled “I Promise to be a good, non-hypocritical Muslim” allegedly used sentences that insulted Muslims.

Raja Petra, popularly known by his initials RPK, is also alleged to have allowed comments to appear on his website that degraded Islam and Prophet Muhammad in an article entitled “Not all Arabs are descendants of the Prophet

Meanwhile, his wife Marina said they had yet to appoint a lawyer to handle the matter.

This is the second time Raja Petra, a father of five and part of the Selangor royal family, has been detained under ISA, which allows for indefinite detention without trial.

His first arrest under the tough security law was on Apr 11, 2001. RPK was detained as part of a crackdown against reformasi activists in which nine others were also held. At that time he was webmaster for the now de-funct FreeAnwar.com

Raja Petra was released after 52 days in detention. However, six of the reformasi leaders were eventually sent to the Kamunting Detention Centre in Taiping where they were detained for two years.

According to Home Minister Syed Hamid Albar, the 58-year old father of five would be detained under Section 73(1) of the ISA, which allows for detention of up to 60 days.

“The police will do an assessment during this period and if they feel he should be held more than 60 days, the police will then refer to me,” Syed Hamid was quoted as saying by The Star.

The minister also confirmed that the Sin Chew Daily, The Sun and Suara Keadilan were issued show cause letters. “They have been given a week to reply,” he added.

Raja Petra’s wife Marina Lee Abdullah earlier told Malaysiakini that 10 police personnel from Bukit Aman came to their home in Sungai Buloh at about 1.10pm to arrest him.

When Malaysiakini contacted her at 1.25pm, the police personnel were still there. However, Raja Petra - popularly known by his initials RPK - was taken away to an unknown destination at 1.50pm. The police also confiscated some books and VCDs.

Marina showed the notice from the police which listed out all the items they have taken from the house (right).

Raja Petra is expected to be held under police’s custody for up to 60 days before being sent to the Kamunting Detention Centre in Taiping, Perak, where ISA detainees are incarcerated.

On Sept 6, Syed Hamid had warned that RPK, who edits the popular news portal Malaysia Today, could be charged under the ISA for comments allegedly insulting Islam and Prophet Muhammad.

The minister said several religious groups - Malaysian Islamic Development Department (Jakim), Yayasan Dakwah Islamiah Malaysia (Yadim), Federal Territory Islamic Religious Council (Maiwp) and Federal Territory Religious Department (Jawi) - had lodged police reports against him.

The groups had complained Raja Petra’s comment in an article entitled ‘I promise to be a good, non-hypocritical Muslim’ allegedly used sentences that insulted Muslims.

The government ordered the blocking of the Malaysia Today website two weeks ago, but the ban was lifted yesterday.

The ban together with Syed Hamid’s warning to invoke the ISA had sparked a public furore against government censorship of the Internet.

Opposition parties too accused Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s administration of attempting to gag the press in a bid to salvage his party’s sinking popularity.

Second time under ISA

Raja Petra is also alleged to have allowed comments to appear on his website that degraded Islam and Prophet Muhammad in an article entitled “Not all Arabs are descendants of the Prophet”.

This is the second time that RPK, a member of the Selangor royal family, has been detained under ISA, which allows for indefinite detention without trial.

His first arrest under the tough security law was on April 10, 2001. RPK was detained as part of a crackdown against reformasi activists in which nine others were also held.

At that time, he was webmaster for the now defunct FreeAnwar.com site.

Raja Petra was subsequently released after 53 days in detention. However, six of the reformasi leaders were eventually sent to the Kamunting Detention Centre in Taiping where they were detained for two years.

Charged earlier for sedition, defamation

The controversial blogger was earlier charged with sedition and defamation after linking Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak and his wife to the sensational murder of a Mongolian woman.

In that case, a close friend of the deputy premier - Abdul Razak Baginda - was charged with abetting the murder of 28-year-old Altantuya Shaariibuu, whose body was blown up with explosives.

Two police officers from an elite force, whose duties included guarding the prime minister and Najib, were also charged with the killing.

The ISA, which human rights groups have pushed to have abolished, provides for renewable two-year periods of detention without trial and is normally used against suspected terrorists.

It has also been used to lock up opponents of the government, and last year five Hindraf leaders were detained three weeks after mounting a mammoth rally in the streets of Kuala Lumpur on Nov 25.

Malaysia Today is a popular Malaysian news blog. It is known for being critical of both the governing Barisan Nasional coalition and opposition parties such as the Democratic Action Party and Parti Keadilan Rakyat. Its founder and editor is Raja Petra Kamarudin, a former political detainee. Founded in August 2004, it has claimed that it has received almost 100 million hits since then, and alleges it has a readership larger than that of the New Straits Times, a major English language daily newspaper in Malaysia. [1] According to The Star, Malaysia Today receives 1.5 million hits a day, and is one of the top ten political sites in Malaysia.[2] The website is currently hosted in neighbouring Singapore.

Note: the URL of Raja Petra's website is "www.malaysia-today.net". A site with a similar address, "www.malaysiatoday.com", is unrelated.

How do you think about this issue? What are your perspectives or what have you perceived?? Is this what we called democracy(partially, fully)? What do you think about ISA itself and the ones that are “using” it for the sake of “justice” and “societal harmony”? Time to ponder now.


get more information throught the links below:

>>Raja Petra Kamarudin

>>Raja Petra ‘arrested under ISA'

>>IS"", the scourge of our modern society

>>Do Raja Petra Justice: Abolish the IS""

>>Malaysia Today


prepared by Vance and Yusoff

Saturday, September 20, 2008

Think About It



Teresa Kok from DAP, who is Member of Parliament for Seputeh, state assemblywoman for Kinrara as well the senior state executive councillor for Selangor was arrested under Section 73 (1) of the Internal Security Act (ISA).She has been accused of stirring up racial sentiments by instigating residents to petition against mosques in Kinrara and Kota Damansara to lower the volume of their speakers.The reports were lodged over an allegation by former Selangor Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Mohamad Khir Toyo that Kok had tried to prohibit the "azan" call to prayer at mosques and surau in Kota Damansara, Sri Serdang and Puchong Jaya because teresa alleged statements could hurt the feelings of the Muslim community.

Teresa has denied these allegations and both mosques have already come out to deny these accusations. Masjid Kinrara, the mosque which is embroiled in an azan controversy, said DAP parliamentarian Teresa Kok was not involved in the petition to lower the volume of its loudspeakers.According to Abdul Rahman Nasir, who is head of the mosque committee, Kok had never set foot in Masjid Kinrara to present the residents' petition.

We are curious. Why was Teresa Kok detained under the ISA? Would the reasons given above justify Teresa's detention without trial under the draconian Internal Security Act ? Is democracy in Malaysia at stake? Think about it.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

ISA: Is it being reinforced properly?


As all of us have noticed, this few weeks have been a chaotic yet dilemma moment for all us who live in the once peaceful land of Malaysia. The incident came to its boiling point when Tan Hoon Cheng (Sin Chew Daily Journalist), Teresa Kok (Seputeh Opposition MP) and Raja Petra Kamaruddin were detained under ISA (Internal Security Act) which resulted in a nation-wide furore and political crisis.



Tan Hoon Cheng, 33, a former graduate from the school of Communication, Universiti Sains Malaysia was taken from her home at Bukit Mertajam and told that she would be taken to Bukit Aman in Kuala Lumpur, but was informed of her release midway through the journey later. The reason she was picked up by the police is that she reported that Umno Bukit Bendera division Chief, Datuk Ahmad Ismail’s speech at a Permatang Pauh by-election ceramah on August 23 that Orang Cina cuma tumpang di sini sahaja (the Chinese are only “squatting” here).

The question here is: Why should she be detained under the act of ISA merely because she reported the truth?

This issue has brought a sense of injustice and hurt among people that the perpetrator has been let off scot-free while the messenger has been penalized. Datuk Ahmad Ismail was being suspended lightly from UMNO for three years ONLY, yet Tan was detained under ISA as the police believed her life was “under threat”, according to Home Minister Syed Hamid Albar.

The last bit to ponder on:

ISA= Internal Security Act or I Simply Arrest? Do think about it =)



Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Technology brings to Democracy, is it true? (PART 4)

This post is the last post that we will discuss about is it true technology can brings us toward a democratic society. We have discussed about ‘A’ and ‘D’ of ‘ADA’, now let’s move on to the last component which is Accountability. Basically, it is about the responsibility of the government to its citizens, there must be some channels provided for the people to use it to voice out their opinions, needs and wants. Do we have the chance to speak out through certain communication system channels? What are the channels that we have?


In a democratic country, citizens have their own rights to be informed on what is going to happen in future, especially in the aspect of politic. What is government always doing is actually all for the citizens, therefore, there is nothing wrong with the latter to find out the truths through any channel, and also give their feedback. Government which is willing to receive the feedback from the citizens and takes an important consideration about it then makes an effective and satisfying decision is called democratic. Let’s put it in the context of Malaysia, did our government receive the feedback from us and change the plans they already have? Or it blames on the feedback and stops the accessibility of channel which we use to voice out our opinions?

I would like to take the issue which has been raised up before, MALAYSIA TODAY is a channel which Raja Petra uses it to write about the truths, the blog readers are also able to leave their comments, it is one of the ways that people voice out their opinions on the recent politic. Unfortunately, the blog has been blocked and Raja Petra was arrested under ISA, he is not given any chance to express his opinions and tell the truths which are considered inciting the country by the government. Do you think our government is accountable to us?

Accountability is the most important character in a society which declare as democracy if compare with other two of character. This is because of accessibility in internet and diversity of information would not exist if a society which do not have accountable of government and people. For instance, the issue of a chieftain of UMNO Ahmad Ismail told an irresponsible speech which about the existence of Chinese Malaysian in Malaysia during the by-election in Permatang Pauh. This issue had become a hot and a big issue in our country during that time. As you can see this kind of irresponsible leader would destroy the unity among race. Besides that, a democratic society must have the element of accountability to ensure people or even leaders act responsible in order to maintain the stability of a country. Moreover, the important reason of accountability in a society is because of government which is actually chosen by our people through the General Election and they represent us to making policies in cabinet. At the same time, they have to be responsible to us so that our people would know that what kind of policies they have planned for our country and whether it would brings benefit to our people or erodes the right of people.

In conclusion, technology actually can improve the relation among people thereby our people have a platform which used for get various information from internet and make discussion and best decision to solve our current hot issue or governmental policies through an abstract space which known as “Public Sphere”. However, nowadays, unfortunately there are a lot of leaders attempt to control the technology like filtering the website in order to avoid someone against them and consolidate their regime. A society must have 3 kind of character like “Accessibility, Diversity, Accountability” thereby to built up a totally democratic society and technology can be said that is a proper tool which can be used by our people toward democracy in future. Who knows once a day it will brings a big reformation and impact for our country?


By ER SIANG (ryan) & YING SHIN

Sunday, September 14, 2008

SEKATAN TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN MALAYSIA TODAY DITARIK BALIK

Datuk Shaziman Abu Mansor iaitu Menteri Tenaga, Air dan Komunikasi mengeluarkan kenyataan bahawa sekatan terhadap penggunaan laman web Malaysia today ditarik balik dan berkuat kuasa serta merta sejak 11 september 2008. keputusan ini dicapai dalam mesyuarat cabinet yang dijalankan pada 10 september 2008 bertujuan bagi menggalakkan rakyat menggunakan Internet sebagai medium penyebaran maklumat dalam dunia tanpa sempadan ini(globalisasi). Hal ini juga ekoran menghormati hak kebebasan rakyat untuk menyuarakan pendapat masing-masing ekoran Negara ditadbir berasaskan kepada pentadbiran demokrasi yang mana rakyat bebas menyuarakan pendapat mereka disamping memilih pemimpin yang dirasakan layak memimpin Negara. Sekatan ke atas Malaysia Today berhubung beberapa artikel penulis blog itu dan tulisan pembacanya yang didapati menghina Nabi Muhammad s.a.w ditarik balik sehingga siasatan ke atasnya selesai.
Sehubungan itu, satu jawatankuasa akan ditubuhkan yang dianggotai oleh Suruhanjaya Komunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia (SKMM), Jabatan Peguam Negara, Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM) dan Kementerian Dalam Negeri (KDN) bagi memantau secara teliti laman-laman web yang didapati mempunyai unsur-unsur hasutan atau perkauman dan menghina agama sehingga menjejaskan keselamatan serta keharmonian Negara akan dikenakan tindakan paling tegas termasuk mengikut ISA.
Persoalan:Adakah pengembalian webside Malaysia Today memberi satu ruang demokrasi kepada rakyat.
Disediakan oleh: Nurul Asyikin bt Abu Seman